What is Forensic Accounting in Trust Litigation?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f4c1/4f4c143ffaea61d61c2f2d7e148cdba1b7b585ed" alt="right-arrow"
What is Discovery in Trust Litigation?
When a trust or estate conflict evolves into litigation, one of the first steps in preparing for a trial is formal discovery. Discovery is a legal procedure in which both sides of a lawsuit discover relevant facts of the case in order to prepare for trial. Whether you’re the trustee who is being sued or a trust beneficiary suing a trustee, you’ll need to understand what facts can and can’t be discovered and how to best approach the discovery process.
The basic rule of discovery is: You can request any information that is even remotely relevant to the issues within the lawsuit, so long as that information isn’t “privileged” or otherwise legally protected.
Here are some of the common tools used in a formal discovery, divided into two categories of written and oral:
Some “privileged” information remains off-limits during the discovery process. Generally, this includes:
California Attorneys are bound by the California State Bar’s Rules of Professional Conduct to engage in ethical discovery methods.
The total length of the discovery process can vary widely. The following requirements must be met before the discovery process can begin:
For written discovery, the other party has 30 days to respond, plus 5 days to allow for mailing.
For subpoenas to third parties (like medical or bank records), the institution must issue a document to the person whose documents are requested called “Notice to the Consumer”. That person will have 15 days to object to the request. After that time period has passed, assuming no objections were made, most institutions typically respond within 15-20 days.
All parties pay the cost of their own discovery. If a party later files a Motion to Compel (asking the court to enforce a request for information relevant to a case) and the court grants that motion, then the prevailing party may be entitled to attorney’s fees.
For both parties, it’s best to be forthcoming and provide the requested information; otherwise, you risk paying the opposition’s attorney fees.
A full-blown court trial is often long and expensive. Discovery can be cost-effective in the big picture, especially if it leads to the parties settling. While discovery can be expensive, it can actually save money by leading the parties to settle the case either before the trial starts or before the end of a full trial.
If you think of the trial as a poker game, discovery is like getting to peek at the opposing player’s cards before the game begins. Through discovery, both sides get a sense of the strength of their side’s position. If you clearly have a winning hand, the opposition may opt to fold before the game even begins.
If you are a trustee, we offer the following advice for discovery:
If you are a trust beneficiary involved in discovery, you will “bear the burden of proof”. This means that you carry the responsibility to show evidence that the trustee has mishandled the trust administration.
Because of this, you will likely be the party making the bulk of the discovery requests. As you approach discovery, think through exactly what information you want to request and what questions you would like answered. Communicate all of this to your trust litigation lawyer.
Remember that discovery often requires knowledge of evidence rules and other technical legal strategies. If discovery becomes necessary, you will want to hire an experienced trust and estate litigator to represent you and build your case. If you have any questions about the discovery process, feel free to contact our office.
The Law Offices of Daniel A. Hunt is a California law firm specializing in Estate Planning; Trust Administration & Litigation; Probate; and Conservatorships. We've helped over 10,000 clients find peace of mind. We serve clients throughout the greater Sacramento region and the state of California.